Article by Shamel Ahmed, published on 7 February 2024 on LikedIn
The matrimonial customs and sexual entitlements of historical and religious luminaries have consistently been a focal point of academic inquiry, underscoring the interplay between prevailing societal mores and spiritual tenets of their eras. Precisely, the conjugal behaviours and sexual rights of Prophet Muhammad, the progenitor of Islam, are elucidated through Islamic lore and the Quran, shedding light on the cultural milieu of 7th-century Arabia. The Quran explicitly permits Muslim men to espouse up to four wives, contingent upon their ability to ensure equitable treatment among them (Quran 4:3). This ordinance was emblematic of the era’s social and tribal constructs, predominantly aimed at safeguarding widows and orphans within a community frequently ravaged by conflict (Esposito, 1998).
In enhancing this discourse, it is pertinent to consider the broader implications of such practices on societal structures and gender dynamics. The allowance for polygamy, as stipulated in the Quran, can be interpreted as a pragmatic response to the social exigencies of the time, such as the need to integrate and support those left vulnerable by warfare. Additionally, this practice underscores the fluidity of marital norms in response to societal needs, reflecting a flexible adaptation to the exigencies of survival and social cohesion.
Moreover, examining the historical context further elucidates the strategic and compassionate motivations behind such marital practices. It wasn’t merely about addressing the immediate needs of widows and orphans but also about fostering alliances among tribes, thereby enhancing communal harmony and security (Armstrong, 1992). This aspect highlights the intricate relationship between marital norms and socio-political strategies in early Islamic society.
To understand the contemporary relevance of these practices, it is essential to engage with modern interpretations and debates surrounding polygamy and gender equity within Islamic jurisprudence (Barlas, 2002). Such discussions contribute to a nuanced comprehension of how historical precedents inform current legal and ethical debates within Muslim communities, showcasing the dynamic interplay between tradition and modernity.
In contrast, the spiritual guru Osho (Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh) championed a divergent perspective on sexuality, advocating for sexual liberation as a pathway to spiritual awakening and a departure from conventional societal standards (Fox, 2002). Osho’s philosophical expositions highlighted the necessity of surpassing conventional moral limitations, notably in sexuality, to attain an elevated state of awareness (Carter, 1990).
Expanding upon this comparison, Osho’s advocacy for sexual freedom can be viewed as a radical critique of traditional values, positing that actual spiritual growth necessitates a liberation from the shackles of conventional morality and social norms. His teachings suggest that by embracing our natural desires and breaking free from societal taboos, individuals can embark on a transformative journey towards self-discovery and enlightenment.
Furthermore, Osho’s approach to sexuality and spirituality reflects a broader critique of organized religion and its often restrictive doctrines regarding personal conduct. By encouraging individuals to explore their sexuality freely, Osho sought to dismantle the barriers that he perceived were hindering personal and spiritual development (Urban, 2005).
It is also critical to contextualize Osho’s teachings within the more significant socio-cultural movements of the 20th century, which witnessed a burgeoning interest in alternative spiritualities and a pushback against traditional moral frameworks. Osho’s emphasis on sexual freedom can be seen as part of this broader movement, advocating for a more open and exploratory approach to spirituality and human experience (Palmer, 1988).
The Role of Sex and Women in Their Teachings
The perspectives on sex and the status of women held by each leader played pivotal roles in their respective religious teachings, albeit through distinctly divergent approaches. Muhammad’s endorsement of polygamy and concubinage was embedded within the jurisprudential and ethical structure of Islam, which accorded rights and safeguards to women involved in such unions. This included entitlements to financial support and inheritance, representing progressive steps for the era (Ali, 2006).
Conversely, Osho’s stance was notably more avant-garde for his era, confronting the conventional institution of monogamous marriage and championing sexual liberty as a conduit to spiritual emancipation. His establishment of a commune that lived by and propagated these principles drew a global following, yet it also incited critique and contention (Urban, 2005).
To further elucidate the contrast, Muhammad’s teachings on polygamy and concubinage were not merely permissive but were framed within a broader ethical paradigm that sought to integrate and protect women within the societal fabric of the time. The provisions for maintenance and inheritance under Islamic law were revolutionary and aimed at ensuring women’s economic security and rights in a period and place where such guarantees were not universally afforded (Engineer, 2004).
In juxtaposition, Osho’s teachings and the practices within his commune represented a radical departure from traditional societal norms, particularly regarding sexual ethics and the role of women. By advocating for sexual freedom and challenging the monogamous marriage framework, Osho posited that true spiritual awakening and liberation from societal constraints were achievable. His approach, while controversial, underscored a critique of societal norms and a reimagining of relationships and gender roles (Fitzgerald, 1997).
Women’s Rights and Roles
Within the Islamic framework during Muhammad’s era, the rights and roles of women were profoundly influenced by the revelations and instructions that laid the groundwork for Islamic legal principles. These principles affirmed women’s rights to inheritance, education, and the autonomy to consent to marriage (Mernissi, 1991). Muhammad’s guidance and actions sought to elevate the societal position of women in 7th-century Arabia, though the interpretation and application of these teachings have varied significantly across different Islamic communities and epochs.
Conversely, within Osho’s movement, women occupied prominent positions, mirroring his philosophies on gender parity and sexual liberation. Nonetheless, the practices within the movement have sparked debates regarding issues of coercion, exploitation, and the authentic empowerment of women participants (Palmer, 1988).
To further contextualize, Muhammad’s reforms in the rights and roles of women can be seen as revolutionary for their time. The granting of rights such as inheritance and education and the emphasis on consent in marriage marked significant departures from the pre-Islamic norms and were intended to provide a framework for the equitable treatment of women in society (Wadud, 1999). These measures not only acknowledged the dignity and rights of women but also aimed to integrate them as equal participants in the socio-economic fabric of the time.
In contrast, the role of women in Osho’s movement, while ostensibly underpinned by ideals of gender equality and liberation, has been subject to scrutiny and criticism. The emphasis on sexual freedom, although intended to challenge and dismantle traditional gender norms, has led to concerns regarding the dynamics of power and consent within the commune. The critique centres around whether the movement’s practices genuinely empowered women or whether they inadvertently reproduced patterns of exploitation and manipulation (Sullivan, 1997).
Comparative Evaluation
Assessing the ramifications of Mohammed and Osho’s teachings on sexual conduct and women’s roles necessitates an examination of the historical, cultural, and theological milieus in which they operated. Both figures introduced ideologies that confronted the established norms of their respective eras. Yet, the legacy and impact of their doctrines on women’s rights and statuses are intricate and widely debated.
For Mohammed, the institution of rights for women within the realms of marriage and broader society marked a notable advancement in the context of 7th-century Arabia. These reforms gave women unprecedented rights, such as inheritance, education, and consent in marriage, representing a significant shift towards gender equity in a period where such concepts were largely absent. However, the diverse interpretations and implementations of these teachings across time have led to varying outcomes for women’s rights within contemporary Islamic communities (Wadud, 1999).
In contrast, Osho’s promotion of sexual liberation and gender equality was a bold challenge to the traditional mores of his time. His teachings sought to dismantle orthodox views on sexuality, marriage, and gender roles, advocating for a society where individuals were free to explore and express their sexualities without judgment or constraint. Despite these progressive ideals, the practical effects of his teachings on women’s empowerment and rights within his commune have been contentious, with critics arguing that the reality often fell short of the ideals, raising concerns over exploitation and genuine autonomy (Fitzgerald, 1986).
To provide a comprehensive analysis, it’s essential to consider the broader socio-cultural impacts of their teachings. Mohammed’s reforms have had a lasting influence on Islamic jurisprudence and ethics, contributing to ongoing debates around gender equality and women’s rights in Muslim societies. These discussions reflect the dynamic nature of Islamic interpretation and the continuous effort to reconcile traditional teachings with contemporary values (Ali, 2006).
On the other hand, Osho’s legacy has contributed to the broader discourse on spirituality, sexuality, and gender, challenging individuals and societies to reconsider their views on these fundamental aspects of human experience. Despite the controversies, his movement has sparked conversations on the nature of spiritual and sexual freedom, influencing various new religious movements and spiritual practices that continue to explore these themes (Urban, 2005).
Conclusion
The exploration of the sexual lives and privileges of Mohammed and Osho, alongside their respective teachings on sex and women, encapsulates broader discourses on power, spirituality, and societal conventions. The enduring legacies of these figures, marked by both controversy and influence, serve as catalysts for ongoing discourse and scrutiny concerning the interplay between religion, sexuality, and gender roles.
Their contributions to discussions on gender and sexuality transcend mere historical curiosity, underscoring the profound impact of religious and spiritual leaders on societal norms and personal freedoms. Mohammed’s initiatives to codify and improve women’s rights within the early Islamic framework introduced significant changes to the social fabric of 7th-century Arabia, fostering a legacy that continues to influence Islamic thought and practices around gender equity. Osho’s radical stance on sexual freedom and gender equality challenged prevailing norms and invited a reevaluation of traditional values, contributing to broader movements towards spiritual and sexual liberation.
These contrasting approaches highlight the diversity of thought within religious and spiritual teachings on matters of gender and sexuality. As such, the narratives of Mohammed and Osho remain pertinent to contemporary discussions on the rights, roles, and representation of women in religious communities and beyond. Their stories provoke a critical examination of how religious and spiritual doctrines shape and are shaped by evolving societal values and norms.
In conclusion, the lives and teachings of Mohammed and Osho offer rich insights into the complex relationship between religion, power, sexuality, and gender roles. Their legacies underscore the dynamic nature of this interplay, inviting continuous dialogue and reflection on how spiritual and religious contexts contribute to our understanding and enactment of gender and sexuality in society.
References
- Ali, K. (2006). Sexual Ethics and Islam: Feminist Reflections on Qur’an, Hadith, and Jurisprudence. Oneworld Publications.
- Armstrong, K. (1992). Muhammad: A Biography of the Prophet. HarperCollins.
- Barlas, A. (2002). Believing Women in Islam: Unreading Patriarchal Interpretations of the Quran. University of Texas Press.
- Carter, L. (1990). Charisma and Control in Rajneeshpuram. Cambridge University Press.
- Carter, L. (1990). Charisma and Control in Rajneeshpuram: The Role of Shared Values in the Creation of a Community. Cambridge University Press.
- Engineer, A.A. (2004). The Rights of Women in Islam: An Authentic Approach. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Esposito, J. (1998). Islam: The Straight Path. Oxford University Press.
- Fitzgerald, R. (1986). Cities on a Hill: A Journey Through Contemporary American Cultures. Simon & Schuster.
- Fitzgerald, S. (1986). Cities on a Hill: A Journey Through Contemporary American Cultures. Simon & Schuster.
- Fitzgerald, S. (1997). Cities on a Hill: A Journey Through Contemporary American Cultures. Simon & Schuster.
- Fox, J. (2002). Osho Rajneesh: Studies in Contemporary Religion. Signature Books.
- Fox, R. (2002). Osho Rajneesh and His Disciples: Some Western Perceptions. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
- Mernissi, F. (1991). The Veil and the Male Elite: A Feminist Interpretation of Women’s Rights in Islam. Addison-Wesley.
- Mernissi, F. (1991). The Veil and the Male Elite: A Feminist Interpretation of Women’s Rights in Islam. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
- Palmer, S. (1988). Moon Sisters, Krishna Mothers, Rajneesh Lovers: Women’s Roles in New Religions. Syracuse University Press.
- Sullivan, L.E. (1997). The New Age and Indigenous Spirituality: Searching for the Sacred. Journal of Contemporary Religion.
- Urban, H. (2005). Tantra: Sex, Secrecy, Politics, and Power in the Study of Religion. University of California Press.
- Urban, H.B. (2005). Tantra: Sex, Secrecy, Politics, and Power in the Study of Religion. University of California Press.
- Wadud, A. (1999). Qur’an and Woman: Rereading the Sacred Text from a Woman’s Perspective. Oxford University Press
Alert thanks to Keerti
Shamel Ahmed is a Security Professional / Risk Manager / Criminologist/ Security and Culture researcher
Comments are closed.